profgrim's Profile
- Group:
- Members
- Active Posts:
- 452 (0.15 per day)
- Most Active In:
- StarCraft II (66 posts)
- Joined:
- 05-September 03
- Profile Views:
- 2,298
- Last Active:
Dec 11 2011 03:55 PM- Currently:
- Offline
My Information
- Member Title:
- Member
- Age:
- 26 years old
- Birthday:
- October 17, 1985
- Nationality:
- British
- Location:
- United Kingdom
- Interests:
- football, rock music. stuff
Contact Information
- E-mail:
- Click here to e-mail me
- MSN:
-
profgrim@hotmail.com
Posts I've Made
-
In Topic: Week Seven: And then there were two
Posted 18 Nov 2011
i'm afraid that under the circumstances, i've decided to pull out of the tournament. good luck to those that remain
-
In Topic: Week Seven: And then there were two
Posted 16 Nov 2011
i would call prime time before 10pm -
In Topic: Week Seven: And then there were two
Posted 14 Nov 2011
-
In Topic: Reviewing some rules
Posted 14 Nov 2011
i have no real preference over a wildcard. i just thought it might mean even more admin
always thinking of you
the map system i was referring to is what they use in a lot of events. there is a 'tournament pool' of maps which can be selected from for the next game by the loser of the last. the first map is random, or pre-selected like we do at present. -
In Topic: Reviewing some rules
Posted 13 Nov 2011
1 no wildcard needed!
2 quite good being able to choose maps. if 3 games are played, 1st map neutral to change each week then after that loser's choice from a map pool of say, 8
3 checking in would be good and hoepfully get players to engage directly rather than through third parties

Help
Find My Content
Display name history
